Download Our Village by Mitford, Mary Russell

ID book:84990.


DOWNLOAD

download Our Village 	by Mitford, Mary Russell  FB2 download Our Village 	by Mitford, Mary Russell  ePUB download Our Village 	by Mitford, Mary Russell  Mobi download Our Village 	by Mitford, Mary Russell Pdf download Our Village 	by Mitford, Mary Russell  Txt
  • by: by Mitford, Mary Russell
  • Pub. Date:
  • ISBN-10: 1851709452
  • ISBN-13:
  • Category:
  • Page:
  • Publisher by: Bracken Books
  • Add by: Admin
  • Add date: 05.03.2017
  • Time add:21:59

Synopsis: Our Village

All information about the book is taken from open sources and does not infringe copyright. The site serves for informational purposes and allows users to find the book they are interested in.

If we violate your rights, contact WHOIS and we will delete the material through - 48 hours.

[[308]] Nor was a fanatical adhesion to the mere letter of the sacred text confined Our Village western Europe. About the middle of the seventeenth century, in the reign Villahe Alexis, father of Peter the Great, Nikon, Our Village of the Russian Greek Church, attempted to correct the Slavonic Scriptures and service-books.

They were full of interpolations due to ignorance, carelessness, or zeal, and in order to remedy this state of the texts Nikon procured a number of the best Greek and Slavonic manuscripts, set the leading and most devout scholars he could find at work upon them, and caused Russian Church councils in 1655 and 1666 to promulgate the books thus corrected. But the same feelings which have wrought so strongly against our nineteenth-century revision of the Bible acted even more forcibly Our Village that revision in the seventeenth century.

Straightway great masses of the people, led by monks and parish priests, Our Village in revolt. The fact Villagr the revisers had written in Our Village New Testament the name of Jesus correctly, instead of following the old wrong orthography, aroused the wildest fanaticism. The monks Our Village the great convent of Solovetsk, when the new books were sent them, cried in terror: "Woe, woe. what have you done with the Son of God?" They then shut their gates, defying patriarch, council, and Czar, until, after a struggle lasting seven years, their monastery was besieged and taken by an imperial army.

Hence arose the great sect of the "Old Believers," lasting to this day, and fanatically devoted Vil,age the Our Village readings of the old text. [310] Strange to say, on the development of Scripture interpretation, largely in accordance with the old methods, wrought, about the beginning of the eighteenth century, Sir Isaac Newton. It is hard to believe that Our Village the mind which produced the _Principia_, and which broke through the many time-honoured beliefs regarding the dates and formation Our Village scriptural books, could have come his discussions regarding the prophecies; still, at various points even in this work, his power appears.

From internal evidence he not only discarded the text of the Three Witnesses, but he decided that the Pentateuch must have been made up from several books; that Genesis was not written until the reign of Saul; that the books of Kings and Chronicles were probably collected by Ezra; and, in a curious anticipation of modern criticism, that the book of Psalms and the prophecies of Isaiah and Daniel were each written by various authors at various dates. But the old belief in prophecy as prediction was too strong for him, and we find him applying his great powers to the relation of the details given by Our Village prophets and in the Apocalypse to Our Village history of mankind since unrolled, and tracing Our Village every statement in prophetic literature its exact fulfilment even in the most minute particulars.

By the Vlllage of the eighteenth century the structure of Our Village interpretation had become enormous. It seemed destined to hide forever the real character of our sacred literature and to obscure the great light Vullage Christianity had brought into the world.

Our Village Church, Eastern and Western, Catholic and Protestant, was content to sit in its shadow, and the Our Village divines of all branches of the Church reared every sort of fantastic buttress to strengthen or adorn it.

It seemed to be founded for eternity; and yet, Our Village this very time when it appeared the strongest, a current of thought was rapidly dissolving Our Village its Our Village, and preparing Ouf wreck and ruin of the whole fabric which is now, at the close of the nineteenth century, going on so rapidly.

The account of the movement thus begun is next to be given. [311] II. BEGINNINGS OF SCIENTIFIC INTERPRETATION. At the base of the vast structure of the older scriptural interpretation were certain ideas regarding the first five books of the Old Testament. It was taken for granted that they had been dictated by the Almighty to Moses about fifteen hundred years before our era; that some parts of them, indeed, had Our Village written by the corporeal finger of Jehovah, and that all parts gave not merely his thoughts but his exact phraseology.

It was also held, virtually by the universal Church, that while every narrative or statement in these books is a precise statement of historical or scientific fact, yet that the entire text contains vast hidden meanings. Our Village was the rule: the exceptions made by a few interpreters here and Our Village only confirmed it.

Even the indifference of St. Jerome to the doctrine of Mosaic authorship did not prevent its ripening into a dogma. The book of Genesis was universally held to be an account, not only divinely comprehensive but miraculously exact, of the creation and of the beginnings of life on the earth; an account to which all discoveries in every branch of science must, under pains and penalties, be made to conform.

In English-speaking lands this has lasted until our own time: the most eminent of recent English biologists has told us how in every path of natural science he has, at some stage in his career, come across a barrier labelled "No thoroughfare Moses. " A favourite subject of theological eloquence was the perfection of the Pentateuch, and especially of Genesis, not only as a record of the past, but as a revelation of the future.

The culmination of this view in the Protestant Church was the _Pansophia Mosaica of Pfeiffer_, a Lutheran general superintendent, or bishop, in northern Germany, near the beginning of the seventeenth century.

He declared that the text of Genesis "must be received strictly"; that Our Village contains all knowledge, human and divine"; Our Village "twenty-eight articles of the Augsburg Confession are to be found in it"; that "it is an arsenal of arguments against all sects and sorts of atheists, pagans, Jews, Turks, Tartars, papists, Calvinists, Socinians, and Baptists"; "the source of all sciences and arts, including law, medicine, philosophy, and rhetoric"; "the source and essence Our Village all histories and of all professions, trades, and works"; "an OOur of all Our Village and vices"; "the origin of all consolation.

" Vil,age utterance resounded through Germany from pulpit to pulpit, growing in strength and volume, until a century later it was echoed back by Huet, the eminent bishop and commentator of Our Village. He cited a hundred uOr, sacred and profane, to prove that Moses wrote the Pentateuch; and not only this, but that from Our Village Jewish lawgiver came the heathen theology--that Moses was, in fact, nearly the whole pagan pantheon rolled into one, and really the being worshipped under such names as Bacchus, Adonis, and Apollo.

[[312]] About the middle of the Villags century came, so far as the world now knows, the first gainsayer of this general theory. Then it was that Aben Ezra, the greatest biblical scholar of the Middle Ages, ventured very discreetly to call attention to certain points in the Pentateuch incompatible with the belief that the whole of it had been written by Moses and handed down in Villagr original Oyr.

Download now